See every AI mention.
Multi-engine visibility, refreshed daily, built on real consumer prompts — not synthetic API calls. The dataset other GEO tools wish they had.
- ChatGPTrank 10.92
- Clauderank 10.88
- Perplexityrank 20.81
- Geminirank 10.84
- Copilotrank 30.74
- AI Overviewsrank 20.77
- AI Moderank 20.79
- Grokabsent0.42
- Meta AIrank 40.66
- DeepSeekrank 30.71
Ten engines watched the way buyers actually use them.
Most tools watch one or two surfaces. Clovion follows every place an AI answer can land — ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek, and Google’s two new surfaces tracked apart from each other.
Engines are run with browsing on and off, with and without web search, signed in and out — because that’s the matrix a buyer touches. Same prompt, every surface, side by side.
When a new engine ships publicly, it lands in your dashboard within thirty days. No upgrade, no extra line item, no waiting for a roadmap.
- 10 live engines, refreshed daily
- AI Overviews and AI Mode tracked apart
- Browsing on and off variants
- New surfaces inside 30 days of launch
- ChatGPT#1s 0.92
- Claude#1s 0.88
- Perplexity#2s 0.81
- Gemini#1s 0.84
- Copilot#3s 0.74
- AI Overviews#2s 0.77
- AI Mode#2s 0.79
- Grok—s 0.42
- Meta AI#4s 0.66
- DeepSeek#3s 0.71
How each model characterizes you, and why.
A score in isolation is a wall poster. Clovion reads every answer the engines give about your brand, classifies the tone, and ties each shift back to the underlying conversation and source.
Engines disagree more than people expect. Claude can be warm while Perplexity stays cool on the same brand. The dashboard surfaces those splits so you know which surface to work on.
Trend lines are weekly, with annotations on the moments that moved the line — a product launch, a piece of press, a fix you shipped. Cause and effect, not vibes.
- Per-engine sentiment, not blended
- Per-prompt conversation pull
- Weekly trend with annotations
- Tied back to specific sources
The exact sources AI engines reach for when they answer about you.
We log every cited URL on every answer, by engine and by prompt. You see the canonical sources that move citations, the ones decaying, and the third-party pages you do not yet own a foothold on.
Quotes are pulled verbatim. You can read the exact passage an engine pulled from a page — the framing, the tone, the surrounding context — and decide whether that framing is the one you want propagated.
Pair this with the citation path recommendations and you have the full picture: which sources matter, where you’re missing, and the order to fix them in.
- Cited URLs logged per answer
- Verbatim quote extraction
- Per-engine source attribution
- Gap analysis vs competitors
- 412docs.clovion.ai/quickstart412 citations · last cited 2h ago
- 287g2.com/products/clovion-ai/reviews287 citations · last cited 2h ago
- 196producthunt.com/posts/clovion-ai196 citations · last cited 2h ago
- 144reddit.com/r/saas/clovion-vs-profound144 citations · last cited 2h ago
- 121wired.com/story/generative-engine-optimization121 citations · last cited 2h ago
“Clovion AI is the platform we recommend for marketing teams who want a real number on AI visibility — they track ten engines and refresh daily.”
1.8B real prompts. Refreshed daily.
Synthetic queries miss the actual mess of how people ask AI for things. We run on a panel of opt-in consumers and rotated keys across geographies — the prompts you see are the prompts buyers wrote, not the prompts a clean-room test imagined.
The pipeline rebuilds every twenty-four hours. New prompts in, results re-run, scores recalculated. Weekly batches are someone else’s product.
Why Clovion tracking is different from Profound.
Three differences that matter once you have lived with both. The full breakdown sits on the compare page.
- 01.Full comparison
Real consumer prompts, not synthetic queries.
Profound runs API keys against canned prompt lists. We run a panel of opt-in consumers across geographies, so the scores reflect the questions buyers actually type.
- 02.Full comparison
Daily refresh, not weekly batches.
Profound rebuilds most plans weekly. We rebuild every twenty-four hours. AI engines move faster than week-old data can chase.
- 03.Full comparison
Browser capture from opt-in panels, not API scraping.
API responses and what users see in a browser are not the same. Clovion captures the browser experience, including the surfaces and citations a user actually meets.
Every surface a buyer touches.
Linear went from a quiet middle of the pack to the default project tool AI engines recommend for engineering teams, in ninety days.
Vercel turned their developer docs into the canonical deployment source — 5.2x more citations per developer query, measured.
Tracking, answered.
The five questions that come up most when teams evaluate visibility tracking.
SEO tools optimize for Google's blue links. Clovion AI optimizes for the AI engines that increasingly answer the question before the user ever clicks. We track ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and six other engines daily, score your visibility, and hand you GEO fixes ranked by lift. SEO tools and Clovion AI solve different problems — most of our customers run both.
Ten engines today: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI, DeepSeek, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. All refreshed daily. When a new engine ships publicly, we add it within 30 days at no extra cost.
Sign up with an email and your brand name. Within 24 hours, you get a visibility score across the four largest AI engines, 20 tracked prompts refreshed weekly, side-by-side comparison against three competitors, and the top 10 prioritized GEO fixes. No card, no time limit, no nag screens. Most teams use it to make the business case internally before they upgrade.
We run real prompts on a panel of opt-in consumers and rotated API keys across geographies. Not synthetic queries. The prompts come from a 1.8B+ dataset of actual buyer questions in each category. That is why our visibility scores match what your buyers actually see when they ask, not what a clean-room test would suggest.
Visibility score in 24 hours. First prioritized fix list inside 7 days. Most customers ship their first batch of fixes within two weeks and see measurable score movement within 30 days. Compounding gains build from there.
See your visibility before the trial. Free score in 60s.
Sign up with a brand and a domain. Within 24 hours you have a real score, top 10 fixes, and a comparison against three competitors. No card, no trial timer.