Compare every GEO tool.
Honest comparisons against every major AI visibility tool. Feature parity, where we win, where they win, and what to ask in a demo.
Four head-to-head comparisons.
Each comparison runs the same fixture: real prompts, current pricing, and the workflow you would actually run on a Tuesday.
Profound is the enterprise incumbent. Strong brand awareness, narrow engine coverage, generic recommendations.
- We track 10 engines. They track 3.
- Our fixes ship ranked by lift with drafted code. Theirs ship as a checklist.
- Starts at $99/mo. They start at $499/mo.
Otterly is the playful self-serve tool. Friendly UI, light analytics, built for solo founders rather than teams with prompt volume over 200/mo.
- We refresh daily on every paid plan. Otterly refreshes weekly.
- Our reports include schema patches and code. Otterly stops at observations.
- Built for teams of 5+. Otterly is built for an audience of one.
Peec leans into agentic dashboards. Heavy on visualization, light on the actual fix workflow. Great if you already know what to do.
- We deliver ranked fixes with proof-of-lift. Peec hands back a dashboard.
- Our crawler analytics cover Vercel, Cloudflare, CloudFront, Fastly. Peec relies on third-party logs.
- We bundle the MCP server on Growth. Peec sells it as a separate SKU.
AthenaHQ is the agency play. Multi-tenant, white-label, retainer-friendly. Less suited to in-house teams running their own GEO program.
- We are priced for in-house teams. Athena is priced for agency margins.
- Our recommendations carry a confidence score. Athena hands you raw signal.
- Our free score returns in 24 hours. Athena requires a sales call to start.
Migrating is the smaller worry.
Most teams overestimate the cost of switching. Three guardrails make the move boring on purpose.
Import your prompts in one upload.
CSV import accepts competitor prompt lists. We normalize the format, dedupe variants, and run the first scan within an hour of import.
No long contract.
Monthly billing on Starter and Visibility. Cancel anytime in the dashboard. Annual plans get a 20% discount but they are never required.
30-day side-by-side trial.
Run Clovion next to your current tool for thirty days. Compare the scores, the fixes, the refresh cadence. Decide on real data, not a sales deck.
How we wrote these comparisons.
Most comparison pages quietly stack the deck. Ours show the work.
We compare against the version of each competitor that exists on the day we publish, not the one in their last fundraising deck. Pricing is pulled from the live page. Features are read from public docs. The recommendation quality is judged from a real test run on the same 50-prompt fixture we use for our own QA.
Where they win, we say so. Profound has a longer track record in finance and pharma. Otterly has a friendlier onboarding for a first-time user. Calling that out is what makes the rest of the comparison worth reading.
- Public pricing pages, captured the week of publication.
- Public docs, changelogs, and API references read in full.
- Side-by-side test runs on the same 50-prompt fixture.
- Updated quarterly. Last refresh: April 2026.
One comparison a quarter, in your inbox.
Each issue is a single competitor teardown — feature delta, pricing changes, and the one workflow that shifted. No drip sequence. No upsell. Unsubscribe in a click.
The fastest comparison is your own score.
Twenty-four hours, real prompts, real engines. See where you sit before you decide who to buy from.